Accession Number : ADA297645
Title : Assessing and Ranking Multi-Attribute Decision Alternatives: An Experiment.
Descriptive Note : Master's thesis,
Corporate Author : NAVAL POSTGRADUATE SCHOOL MONTEREY CA
Personal Author(s) : Tiller, David C.
PDF Url : ADA297645
Report Date : MAR 1995
Pagination or Media Count : 119
Abstract : This thesis documents the collection and analysis of experimental data used to compare and contrast three methods of evaluating attribute choices that have no natural measurement basis. Attribute choice evaluation is prerequisite to ranking and evaluating multi-attribute decision alternative sets. Data for the methods center on subjective inputs from subject matter experts. The particular experiment collected response data from 27 experts in the United States Navy LAMPS (Light Airborne Multipurpose System) helicopter community attached to the Naval Postgraduate School. The pilots compared three helicopter systems (attribute choices) in each of four system categories (attributes); weapons, navigation systems, communication systems, and sensors. The complete procedure would evaluate every feasible helicopter system suite (decision alternative set), each set composed of one attribute choice from every attribute, facilitating ordinal ranking of the sets. Thesis results present consistency analyses of the experts' responses within, and between, the three methods of determining attribute choice values.
Descriptors : *DECISION MAKING, *ELECTRONIC SUPPORT MEASURES, TEST AND EVALUATION, WEAPONS, MEASUREMENT, CONTRAST, EXPERIMENTAL DATA, DETECTORS, COMMUNITIES, NAVY, AIRBORNE, PILOTS, LIGHT, THESES, CONSISTENCY, HELICOPTERS, NAVIGATION, RESPONSE, LINEARITY, SCALING FACTOR, COMMUNICATION AND RADIO SYSTEMS, VALUE, LAMPS, MULTIPURPOSE.
Subject Categories : Countermeasures
Distribution Statement : APPROVED FOR PUBLIC RELEASE