Accession Number : ADA318290
Title : NASA/DOD Aerospace Knowledge Diffusion Research Project. Paper Fifty Eight - Survey of Reader Preferences Concerning the Format of NASA Langley-Authored Technical Reports. Paper Presented at Greyworks '96 - The Second U.S. Workshop on Grey Literature organized by GreyNet, The Grey Literature Network Service and held at the Inn and Conference Center, University of Maryland, College Park, Maryland.
Corporate Author : NATIONAL AERONAUTICS AND SPACE ADMINISTRATION HAMPTON VA LANGLEY RESEARCH CEN TER
Personal Author(s) : Pinelli, Thomas E. ; Barclay, Rebecca O. ; Kennedy, John M.
PDF Url : ADA318290
Report Date : 18 NOV 1996
Pagination or Media Count : 22
Abstract : The U.S. government technical report is a primary means by which the results of federally funded research and development (R&D) are transferred to the U.S. aerospace industry. However, little is known about this information product in terms of its actual use, importance, and value in the transfer of federally funded R&D. Little is also known about the intermediary-based system that is used to transfer the results of federally funded R&D to the U.S. aerospace industry. To help establish a body of knowledge, the U.S. government technical report is being investigated as part of the NASA/DoD Aerospace Knowledge Diffusion Research Project. In this paper, we summarize the literature on the U.S. government technical report and present the results of a survey of U.S. aerospace engineers and scientists that solicited their opinions concerning the format of NASA Langley Research Center (LaRC)-authored technical reports. To learn more about the preferences of U.S. aerospace engineers and scientists concerning the format of NASA LaRC-authored technical reports, we surveyed 133 report producers (i.e., authors) and 137 report users in March-April 1996. Questions covered such topics as (a) the order in which report components are read, (b) components used to determine if a report would be read, (c) those components that could be deleted, (d) the placement of such components as the symbols list, (e) the desirability of a table of contents, (f) the format of reference citations, (g) column layout and right margin treatment, and (h) and person and voice. Mail (self-reported) surveys were used to collect the data. The response rates for report producers (i.e., authors) was 68% and for users was 62%.
Descriptors : *REPORTS, *SURVEYS, *ENGINEERS, *AEROSPACE INDUSTRY, DEPARTMENT OF DEFENSE, SYMPOSIA, BIBLIOGRAPHIES, RATES, RESEARCH FACILITIES, AEROSPACE SYSTEMS, RESPONSE, INDEXES, TECHNICAL INFORMATION CENTERS, TECHNICAL WRITING, READING MACHINES.
Subject Categories : Aerodynamics
Distribution Statement : APPROVED FOR PUBLIC RELEASE