Accession Number : ADA324338

Title :   Big Tank Little Bridge: Is There A Position On The Peace Operations Team For Heavy Armor?

Descriptive Note : Monograph,

Corporate Author : ARMY COMMAND AND GENERAL STAFF COLL FORT LEAVENWORTH KS SCHOOL OF ADVANCED MIL ITARY STUDIES

Personal Author(s) : James, Thomas S., Jr

PDF Url : ADA324338

Report Date : 17 DEC 1996

Pagination or Media Count : 62

Abstract : The past decade has witnessed incredible change in the stability of the world. The end of the Cold War completely changed the international equation. The standard Soviet template no longer dominates the threat model. Based on the decreasing potential for conventional war, increasing probability for peace operations, and a shrinking defense budget; military and political leaders must invest in weapon systems capable of operating effectively in both environments. This monograph discusses the importance of including heavy armor in the peace operations force package. The M1A1 tank provides the force commander with an increase in force protection and a psychological advantage over potential threats. Force protection is one of the most important considerations in peace operations. Heavy armor helps minimize the risk by providing a heavily armored platform which contains maximum force protection in any environment. Speed, mobility, potential firepower, and ability to function at night contribute to providing supporting fires for infantry forces in operations often involving urban terrain. An analysis of the Battle of Mogadishu, where the Quick Reaction Force attacked to relieve Task Force Ranger in the Bakara Market, and the mine clearing and lane proofing functions in Bosnia provides the foundation for this analysis. Furthermore, these case studies illustrate the psychological impact armor has on stabilizing situations. The use of the First Armored Division in Bosnia to demonstrate United States resolve and the use of tanks by the 1st Marine Corps Tank Battalion (FWD) during Operation Restore Hope illustrate that the presence of armor can defuse potentially volatile situations without firing a shot. The conclusion uncovers that heavy armor forces should own a position on the peace operations team.

Descriptors :   *TANKS(COMBAT VEHICLES), *PEACEKEEPING, COMBAT EFFECTIVENESS, MILITARY ASSISTANCE, MILITARY DOCTRINE, TASK FORCES, CASE STUDIES, THREAT EVALUATION, MINE CLEARANCE, SOMALIA, FIRE SUPPORT, FIREPOWER, PSYCHOLOGICAL WARFARE, INTERNATIONAL RELATIONS, BOSNIA HERZEGOVINA.

Subject Categories : Military Operations, Strategy and Tactics
      Combat Vehicles

Distribution Statement : APPROVED FOR PUBLIC RELEASE